Twitch streamer Félix “xQc” Lengyel has once again stirred discussion in the streaming community after commenting on Hasan Piker’s public image and how appearance may shape his popularity. In a recent clip shared on X by user @Awk20000, xQc suggested that the media and audiences treat Hasan more favorably because of his looks, claiming that similar behavior from others would draw far harsher criticism. His statement has sparked widespread debate online about privilege, public perception, and double standards within the creator space.
In the viral clip, xQc said, “If he wasn’t conventionally attractive, he’d be outcast… come on bruh, why even say that?” The comment came as part of a broader critique of how Hasan handles public controversies, and how audiences often overlook questionable remarks because of his appearance and reputation. xQc implied that Hasan’s charisma and looks help shield him from the kind of backlash other creators might face, reigniting a long-standing conversation about bias and influencer favoritism on social platforms.
xQc questions how appearance shapes audience perception of streamers
xQc’s remarks quickly gained traction, with viewers divided over his take. Supporters argued that he voiced an uncomfortable truth about the entertainment industry, that attractiveness often influences credibility and tolerance levels. Critics, however, accused xQc of taking an unnecessary personal jab at Hasan, claiming that popularity in streaming relies more on content quality and consistency than appearance.
Fan responses mirrored the divide. One viewer wrote, “If Hasan looked like Asmongold and said the same stuff he says, he’d lose half his audience and probably grift to the right.”
Another added, “I think he’s only popular because of his outlandish views on BS… his whole channel is just rage bait.” These reactions reflect a broader frustration over what many perceive as media bias and selective outrage in the streamer community.
xQc’s comments have once again put Twitch’s biggest personalities under scrutiny, fueling ongoing debates about bias, branding, and how perception affects accountability. While Hasan Piker has not directly responded, the discourse continues to trend across social platforms. For many viewers, the incident highlights a growing question within streaming culture, does appearance really decide who gets criticized and who gets a pass?
Also Read: Asmongold urges advertisers and Amazon to act after Twitch unbans Nina Lin
In the viral clip, xQc said, “If he wasn’t conventionally attractive, he’d be outcast… come on bruh, why even say that?” The comment came as part of a broader critique of how Hasan handles public controversies, and how audiences often overlook questionable remarks because of his appearance and reputation. xQc implied that Hasan’s charisma and looks help shield him from the kind of backlash other creators might face, reigniting a long-standing conversation about bias and influencer favoritism on social platforms.
xQc questions how appearance shapes audience perception of streamers
xQc’s remarks quickly gained traction, with viewers divided over his take. Supporters argued that he voiced an uncomfortable truth about the entertainment industry, that attractiveness often influences credibility and tolerance levels. Critics, however, accused xQc of taking an unnecessary personal jab at Hasan, claiming that popularity in streaming relies more on content quality and consistency than appearance.
xQc comments on how Hasan would be treated by media, etc if he looked different
— yeet (@Awk20000) November 6, 2025
Also wonders why Piker had to say out loud he talked to Zohran
“If he wasn’t conventionally attractive he would be outcast..come on bruh, why even say that..aren’t ppl gonna get mad abt that bc… pic.twitter.com/myy7FZDGoZ
Fan responses mirrored the divide. One viewer wrote, “If Hasan looked like Asmongold and said the same stuff he says, he’d lose half his audience and probably grift to the right.”
Another added, “I think he’s only popular because of his outlandish views on BS… his whole channel is just rage bait.” These reactions reflect a broader frustration over what many perceive as media bias and selective outrage in the streamer community.
xQc’s comments have once again put Twitch’s biggest personalities under scrutiny, fueling ongoing debates about bias, branding, and how perception affects accountability. While Hasan Piker has not directly responded, the discourse continues to trend across social platforms. For many viewers, the incident highlights a growing question within streaming culture, does appearance really decide who gets criticized and who gets a pass?
Also Read: Asmongold urges advertisers and Amazon to act after Twitch unbans Nina Lin
You may also like

NBA trade rumors: Houston Rockets potentially eyeing $125.9 million Boston Celtics superstar to boster squad around Kevin Durant

"Those who were appointed as guardians of right to vote...": Rahul Gandhi trains guns on EC over 'Vote-Chori' claims

Keir Starmer humiliated as he stumbles live on ITV in front of William

Royal Family RECAP: Meghan Markle accused of trying to overshadow William in Brazil

Police look for culprit of arson attack on war memorial days before Remembrance Sunday




